Background: In most nursing curricula, simulation and problem-based learning (PBL) are used separately as individual learning methods. Nursing educators are in a unique position to improve students' clinical performance and critical thinking skills by utilizing varied educational modalities.
Purpose: This study attempted to compare changes in nursing students' knowledge, confidence in skill performance (CSP), and satisfaction resulting from training using three educational modalities.
Participants: Data from a convenient sample of 205 senior nursing students from three nursing schools in Seoul and Chuncheon, South Korea, was obtained between September 1 and December 10, 2013.
Methods: This comparison study used three groups: the PBL group, simulation with the PBL group, and the control group. For data analysis, descriptive statistics, paired t-test, one-way ANOVA, and post-hoc tests (Duncan test) were performed.
Results: No significant difference in the students' baseline knowledge of patient care for patients with bronchiolitis was found. There were significant differences in the mean scores of knowledge (F=14.718, p<.001), CSP (F=12.693, p<.001), and students' satisfaction (F=93.471, p<.001) among the three groups.
Conclusion: The positive impact of PBL and a combined learning method in this study suggests that it can be an effective approach in pediatric nursing practice. These results provide a much-needed template and starting point for educators introducing active learning approaches for pediatric nursing courses.
Keywords: Bronchiolitis; Child; Nursing education; Patient simulation; Problem-based learning.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.