Routine histopathologic examination of "benign" anal lesions: is it necessary?

Surg Today. 2015 Apr;45(4):416-21. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1090-2. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

Abstract

Purpose: To establish the necessity of routine histopathologic examination of specimens from hemorrhoids and anal fistula that are diagnosed preoperatively.

Methods: We reviewed histopathologic reports from hemorrhoidectomy and anal fistula excision operations performed between 2007 and 2011 in the sixth affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital. We evaluated the incidence of unexpected pathologic malignancy and its impact on postoperative management.

Results: Among the 10532 patients recruited, 8308 had undergone hemorrhoidectomy and 2224 had undergone excision of an anal fistula. Unexpected pathologic malignancy was discovered in 17 specimens (0.16 %). Overall and subgroup analysis for risk factors of malignant detection revealed unexpected pathologic malignancy was more likely to be found in people over the age of 60 years (OR = 5.516, P = 0.002 overall and OR = 5.442, P = 0.007 for hemorrhoids).

Conclusion: Routine histopathologic examination of specimens from patients undergoing hemorrhoid or anal fistula surgery is of value for identifying unexpected pathologic malignancy. An age older than 60 years may be a remarkable risk factor.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anus Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Anus Neoplasms / epidemiology*
  • Anus Neoplasms / pathology
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hemorrhoids / pathology*
  • Hemorrhoids / surgery
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Incidental Findings
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Rectal Fistula / pathology*
  • Rectal Fistula / surgery
  • Rectal Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Rectal Neoplasms / epidemiology*
  • Rectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors