Background and study aims: Endoscopic suturing reduces stent migration, but is challenging and time-consuming. We compare endoscopic suturing versus anchoring with a novel over-the-scope clip (Padlock) to fix esophageal stents. Additionally, the first clinical case of Padlock stent fixation is reported.
Materials and methods: A fully covered esophageal stent was placed in 11 pigs and fixed with one figure-of-eight suture (n = 5) or with a Padlock (n = 4) or not fixed (controls; n = 2). The force required to mobilize the stent was recorded.
Clinical case: an esophageal stent was fixed with a Padlock and endoscopically removed 1 month later, in an 82-year-old patient.
Results: Mean force (newton) to mobilize the stent was similar after suturing and Padlock fixation (23.99 ± 14.91 vs. 19.97 ± 7.62; p = 0.32). In controls was 7 and 11 Newtons. Suturing time (seconds) was longer than Padlock application (455.4 ± 144.83 vs. 155 ± 12.9; p = 0.002).
Clinical case: stent fixation was feasible and uncomplicated. Removal was easy, and only mild bleeding occurred.
Conclusions: Padlock is faster than endoscopic suturing and achieves similar stent fixation. The first clinical case confirms the feasibility of the method.
Keywords: Aponos clip; Clips; Endoscopic suturing; Fully covered self-expandable metal stents; Overstitch; Stent fixation; Stent, stent migration.