Cost-effectiveness of therapies for melanoma

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Apr;15(2):229-42. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.1017563. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

Abstract

Melanoma presents an important burden worldwide. Until recently, the prognosis for unresectable and metastatic melanoma was poor, with 10% of metastatic melanoma patients surviving for 2 years. The introduction of newer therapies including ipilimumab, vemurafenib, dabrafenib and trametinib improved progression-free survival, with additional benefits anticipated from the forthcoming class of programmed cell death 1 inhibitors. Cost of therapy and resulting cost-effectiveness is an important factor in determining patient access to specific treatments. The objective of this study was to review the published evidence regarding cost-effectiveness of melanoma therapies and provide an overview of the relative cost-effectiveness of available therapies by disease stage. For earlier-stage disease, IFN-α has been found to be cost-effective, although its clinical benefits have not been well established. For unresectable and metastatic melanoma, newer therapies provide benefits over standard-of-care chemotherapy, but comprehensive analyses will need to be conducted to determine the most cost-effective therapy.

Keywords: cost–effectiveness; economic evaluation; melanoma; oncology; review.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / economics
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Drug Design
  • Humans
  • Melanoma / economics
  • Melanoma / pathology
  • Melanoma / therapy*
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Prognosis
  • Skin Neoplasms / economics
  • Skin Neoplasms / pathology
  • Skin Neoplasms / therapy*

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents