Comparison of enamel-bracket bond strength using direct- and indirect-bonding techniques with a self-etching ion releasing S-PRG filler

Dent Mater J. 2015;34(1):41-7. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-138. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

Abstract

This in vitro study compared the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of two systems for bonding orthodontic brackets to enamel. The first system involved a self-etching primer (Beauty Ortho Bond, BO) containing surface pre-reacted glass filler. The second involved a primer applied with phosphoric acid etching (Transbond XT, TX). Ninety-six extracted human premolars were divided into eight groups: Group I (TX/direct bonding), Group II (TX/indirect bonding), Group III (BO/direct bonding), and Group IV (BO/indirect bonding). Groups V-VIII were identical to Groups I-IV, respectively, but were also subjected to 1,500 thermal cycles between 5 and 55°C. ARI was scored by binocular microscopy. SBS was analyzed by three-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni test. ARI was analyzed by the chi-squared test. The BO groups showed lower SBS and ARI results than the TX groups. SBS was significantly influenced by the primer material, bonding technique, and thermal cycling.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adhesiveness
  • Bicuspid
  • Dental Bonding / methods*
  • Dental Enamel*
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Humans
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Materials Testing
  • Orthodontic Brackets*
  • Resin Cements / chemistry*
  • Shear Strength
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • Beauty Ortho Bond
  • Resin Cements
  • Transbond XT