A multi-centre audit of epistaxis management in England: is there a case for a national review of practice?

J Laryngol Otol. 2015 May;129(5):454-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115000596. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

Abstract

Objective: The ENT-UK Clinical Audit and Practice Advisory Group initiated a pilot audit to investigate variance in epistaxis management between six units nationwide.

Method: All patients with a diagnosis of epistaxis who were admitted for in-patient care at six ENT departments between November 2011 and February 2012 were prospectively enrolled.

Results: A total of 166 patients were included in the study. Variance was demonstrated between the six units in a number of the key outcome areas. Twenty-eight per cent of patients were identified as eligible for operative intervention for epistaxis in one unit, compared with only 12.5 per cent in another.

Conclusion: There are measurable, patient-relevant outcomes to assess epistaxis management and these can highlight areas of potential improvement. This pilot audit gives a snapshot of modern practice, which shows variance between the six units assessed. A national audit may allow us to improve patient experience and maximise efficiency in delivering emergency care in our most common patient encounter.

Keywords: Epistaxis; Prevention & Control; Surgery.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Disease Management
  • England
  • Epistaxis / therapy*
  • Hospital Departments / standards
  • Hospital Departments / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Medical Audit / statistics & numerical data*
  • Middle Aged
  • Pilot Projects
  • Prospective Studies