Biomechanical Analysis of Scapholunate Ligament Repair Techniques

Purpose: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of 3 scapholunate repair techniques.

Methods: In 51 cadavers, the scapholunate ligament was exposed through a dorsal approach, incised at its scaphoid insertion, and repaired using 1 of 3 techniques: 2 single-loaded suture anchors, 2 double-loaded suture anchors, or 2 transosseous sutures. Twenty-four repaired specimens underwent load to failure (LTF) testing using tensile distraction on a servo-hydraulic machine. Twenty-seven specimens underwent cyclical testing to measure gap formation at the scapholunate joint.

Results: The mode of failure was suture pullout through the substance of the ligament in 22 specimens, failure at the bone suture interface in 1, and anchor pullout in 1. Double-loaded anchor repairs demonstrated a significantly higher mean ultimate LTF compared with single-loaded anchor (91 N vs 35 N) and transosseous (91 N vs 60 N) repairs. Transosseous repairs demonstrated a higher mean ultimate LTF compared with single-loaded suture repairs (60 N vs 35 N). After 300 cycles, the average gap for the transosseous repair group was double that for the single- and double-loaded repairs, although not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Primary scapholunate ligament repairs using double-loaded suture anchors demonstrated significantly higher strength compared with single-loaded anchors and transosseous repairs. On cyclic loading, transosseous repairs demonstrated the greatest gap formation with no measurable difference between single- and double-loaded repairs.

Clinical relevance: In a cadaveric model for primary repairs, double-loaded suture anchors demonstrated the highest LTF and offer a similar but unproven performance in vivo.