Use of flow-diverting stents as salvage treatment following failed stent-assisted embolization of intracranial aneurysms

J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jul;8(7):692-5. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011672. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

Abstract

Flow-diverting stents, including the Pipeline embolization device (PED) and Silk, have been beneficial in the treatment of aneurysms previously unable to be approached via endovascular techniques. Recurrent aneurysms for which stent-assisted embolization has failed are a therapeutic challenge, given the existing intraluminal construct with continued blood flow into the aneurysm. We report our experience using flow-diverting stents in the repair of 25 aneurysms for which stent-assisted embolization had failed. Nineteen (76%) of these aneurysms at the 12-month follow-up showed improved Raymond class occlusion, with 38% being completely occluded, and all aneurysms demonstrated decreased filling. One patient developed a moderate permanent neurologic deficit. Appropriate stent sizing, proximal and distal construct coverage, and preventing flow diverter deployment between the previously deployed stent struts are important considerations to ensure wall apposition and prevention of endoleak. Flow diverters are shown to be a reasonable option for treating previously stented recurrent cerebral aneurysms.

Keywords: Aneurysm; Angiography; Flow Diverter; Intervention.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cerebral Angiography / methods
  • Embolization, Therapeutic / instrumentation
  • Embolization, Therapeutic / methods*
  • Endovascular Procedures / instrumentation
  • Endovascular Procedures / methods
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intracranial Aneurysm / diagnostic imaging*
  • Intracranial Aneurysm / therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Salvage Therapy / instrumentation
  • Salvage Therapy / methods*
  • Stents / statistics & numerical data*
  • Treatment Failure
  • Treatment Outcome