Identification of a subgroup with worse prognosis among patients with poor-risk testicular germ cell tumor

Int J Urol. 2015 Oct;22(10):923-7. doi: 10.1111/iju.12844. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Abstract

Objectives: To clarify the significance of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification in the 2000s, especially in intermediate- and poor-prognosis testicular germ cell tumor in Japan.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 117 patients with intermediate- and poor-prognosis testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumor treated at five university hospitals in Japan between 2000 and 2010. Data collected included age, levels of tumor markers, spread to non-pulmonary visceral metastases, treatment details and survival.

Results: The median follow-up period of all patients was 57 months. A total of 50 patients (43%) were classified as having intermediate prognosis, and 67 patients (57%) as poor prognosis according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification. As first-line chemotherapy, 92 patients (79%) received bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin. Of all patients, 74 patients (63%) received second-line chemotherapy. The most commonly used second-line chemotherapy regimens were a combination of taxanes, ifosfamide and platinum in 49 cases (66%). Overall, 33 patients (28%) received third-line chemotherapy. A total of 88 patients (75%) underwent post-chemotherapy surgery. The 5-year overall survival for intermediate (n = 50) and poor prognosis (n = 67) was 89% and 83% (P = 0.21), respectively. In poor prognosis patients, patients with two or more risk factors (any of high lactic dehydrogenase, alpha-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin levels, and presence of non-pulmonary visceral metastases) had significantly worse survival than those with only one risk factor (71% and 91%, respectively, P = 0.01).

Conclusions: The 5-year overall survivals of poor-prognosis testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumor patients reached 83%. Further stratification of poor-prognosis patients based on a number of risk factors has the potential to further identify those with poorer prognosis.

Keywords: chemotherapy; germ cell tumor; neoplasm of testis; poor prognosis; prognostic subgroups.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Chorionic Gonadotropin / blood
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • L-Lactate Dehydrogenase / blood
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal / classification*
  • Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal / mortality
  • Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal / secondary
  • Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal / therapy*
  • Orchiectomy
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Testicular Neoplasms / classification*
  • Testicular Neoplasms / mortality
  • Testicular Neoplasms / pathology
  • Testicular Neoplasms / secondary
  • Testicular Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Young Adult
  • alpha-Fetoproteins / metabolism

Substances

  • Chorionic Gonadotropin
  • alpha-Fetoproteins
  • L-Lactate Dehydrogenase

Supplementary concepts

  • Nonseminomatous germ cell tumor