Meta-Analysis of Non-O Blood Group as an Independent Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Disease

To determine whether non-O blood group is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), we performed a meta-analysis of contemporary studies reporting adjusted relative risk estimates using multivariable logistic regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from January 2001 to March 2015 using Web-based search engines (PubMed and OVID). Search terms included blood group/type and coronary (artery/heart) disease, ischemic/ischaemic heart disease, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, or angina. Eligible were case-control, cross-sectional, or cohort studies reporting adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) for CAD in subjects with non-O versus O blood group using multivariable logistic regression/multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic ORs/HRs in the random-effects model. Of 117 potentially relevant articles screened initially, 12 relative risk estimates in 10 eligible studies were identified and included. Pooled analysis of all the 12 ORs/HRs demonstrated that non-O blood group was associated with a statistically significant 14% increase in CAD incidence relative to O blood group (OR/HR 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.25, p = 0.006). There was no evidence of significant publication bias. Combining 8 studies reporting data regarding (acute) myocardial infarction also generated a statistically significant result unfavoring non-O blood group (OR/HR 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.31, p = 0.02). In conclusion, we found that based on a meta-analysis of 10 studies enrolling a total of 174,945 participants, non-O blood group appears to be an independent risk factor for CAD and myocardial infarction.