Background: Guideline-defined asthma control can be achieved and maintained in patients by treatment with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (FP-Sal).
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of FP-Sal delivered via a novel multidose dry powder inhaler (mDPI) versus an originator device in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.
Methods: Patients ages 12-65 years (N = 555) were randomized to treatment with FP-Sal novel mDPI 100 μg-50 μg or 500 μg-50 μg, or originator device 100 μg-50 μg or 500 μg-50 μg in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter study. Primary efficacy measures were absolute change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline and the area under the 12-hour serial FEV1 curve at the end of 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included mean changes in FEV1; FEV1 % predicted; morning predose peak expiratory flow; daytime, nighttime, total asthma symptom scores; rescue medication use; percentage of patients with guideline-defined controlled asthma; global efficacy evaluation; patients' device preference; and safety.
Results: FP-Sal mDPI and originator device-mediated increases in FEV1 from baseline to the end of treatment were not significantly different, difference in least squares mean, -0.065 L (95% confidence interval, -0.154 to 0.024 L) at 100 μg-50 μg, and -0.032 L (95% confidence interval, -0.121 to 0.057 L) at 500 μg-50 μg). Both doses of FP-Sal mDPI improved FEV1 area under the 12-hour serial FEV1 curve from baseline and all secondary efficacy measures with no significant differences from the originator device at equivalent doses, with similar safety profiles.
Conclusions: FP-Sal mDPI demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety profile to the originator device and is an alternative in this patient group.