Do labetalol and methyldopa have different effects on pregnancy outcome? Analysis of data from the Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) trial

BJOG. 2016 Jun;123(7):1143-51. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13569. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

Abstract

Objective: To compare pregnancy outcomes, accounting for allocated group, between methyldopa-treated and labetalol-treated women in the CHIPS Trial (ISRCTN 71416914) of 'less tight' versus 'tight' control of pregnancy hypertension.

Design: Secondary analysis of CHIPS Trial cohort.

Setting: International randomised controlled trial (94 sites, 15 countries).

Population or sample: Of 987 CHIPS recruits, 481/566 (85.0%) women treated with antihypertensive therapy at randomisation. Of 981 (99.4%) women followed to delivery, 656/745 (88.1%) treated postrandomisation.

Methods: Logistic regression to compare outcomes among women who took methyldopa or labetalol, adjusted for the influence of baseline factors.

Main outcome measures: CHIPS primary (perinatal loss or high level neonatal care for >48 hours) and secondary (serious maternal complications) outcomes, birthweight <10th centile, severe maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia and delivery at <34 or <37 weeks.

Results: Methyldopa and labetalol were used commonly at randomisation (243/987, 24.6% and 238/987, 24.6%, respectively) and post-randomisation (224/981, 22.8% and 433/981, 44.1%, respectively). Following adjusted analyses, methyldopa (versus labetalol) at randomisation was associated with fewer babies with birthweight <10th centile [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.48; 95% CI 0.20-0.87]. Methyldopa (versus labetalol) postrandomisation was associated with fewer CHIPS primary outcomes (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.40-1.00), birthweight <10th centile (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32-0.92), severe hypertension (aOR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.83), pre-eclampsia (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.85), and delivery at <34 weeks (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.96) or <37 weeks (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.85).

Conclusion: These nonrandomised comparisons are subject to residual confounding, but women treated with methyldopa (versus labetalol), particularly those with pre-existing hypertension, may have had better outcomes.

Tweetable abstract: There was no evidence that women treated with methyldopa versus labetalol had worse outcomes.

Keywords: CHIPS trial; hypertension; labetalol; methyldopa; pregnancy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Blood Pressure / drug effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / physiopathology
  • Hypertension / prevention & control
  • Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced / physiopathology
  • Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced / prevention & control*
  • Infant, Low Birth Weight
  • Labetalol / therapeutic use*
  • Methyldopa / therapeutic use*
  • Pre-Eclampsia / etiology
  • Pre-Eclampsia / physiopathology
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular / physiopathology
  • Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular / prevention & control
  • Pregnancy Outcome

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Methyldopa
  • Labetalol