Stone size and quality of life: A critical evaluation after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015 Sep 30;87(3):227-32. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2015.3.227.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of the patients after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) on a treated stone size related basis.

Methods: 90 patients undergoing ESWL for kidney stones were divided into three groups; Group 1 (n: 30, ≤ 10 mm), Group 2 (n: 28, 11 mm- ≤ 20 mm) and Group 3 (n: 32, 20- 25 mm). During 3- months follow-up, outcome of the procedure, number of cases with emergency department visits, analgesic required, re-tretatment rates, additional procedures and the changes in the QoL were evaluated.

Results: the number of emergency department visits and mean analgesic need; re-treatment rates and additional procedures were significantly higher in Group 3. Evaluation of the QoL scores in three groups showed that cases with larger stone still had lower scores during 3-month evaluation.

Conclusions: Stone size could help us to predict the possible impact of ESWL on the QoL and depending on the size of the stone treated, a well planned indication and effective management possibly by an experienced urologist could limit the changes in the QoL of the patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kidney Calculi / diagnostic imaging*
  • Kidney Calculi / pathology
  • Kidney Calculi / therapy*
  • Lithotripsy* / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life*
  • Retreatment
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ultrasonography