Addressing HIV stigma in protected medical settings

AIDS Care. 2015;27(12):1439-42. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1114990. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that the implementation of universal precaution (UP) plays a role in reducing HIV stigma. In this study we investigate the efficacy of a stigma reduction intervention on UP compliance and explore whether UP compliance could potentially influence HIV stigma reduction in medical settings. A randomized controlled intervention trial was conducted in two provinces of China with 1760 healthcare service providers recruited from 40 county-level hospitals. Longitudinal analyses included data collection at baseline, 6-, and 12-month follow-up assessments. Using a hierarchical modeling approach, we estimated the intervention effect for each provider's UP compliance and its potential mediating role on HIV stigma with the bootstrapping method. A significant intervention effect on UP compliance was observed at both the 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments. The intervention effect on provider avoidance intent was partially mediated by the provider's own UP compliance at the two follow-up points. This study provides evidence that UP compliance should be part of HIV stigma reduction programs, especially in resource-restrained countries. Findings suggest that a protected work environment may be necessary but not sufficient to address HIV stigma in medical settings.

Keywords: China; HIV; Universal precautions; intervention; stigma.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • China
  • Discrimination, Psychological
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Guideline Adherence / statistics & numerical data
  • HIV Infections / diagnosis
  • HIV Infections / drug therapy
  • HIV Infections / psychology*
  • Health Personnel
  • Hospital Administration*
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Inservice Training / methods*
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Program Evaluation
  • Social Stigma*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Universal Precautions*