Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) for assessment of the resectibility of periampullary neoplasm.
Methods: a retrospective analysis of 93 patients with periampullary neoplasm underwent CT and CE-EUS was conducted to compare the imaging data with the surgical and pathological findings, in order to evaluate their efficacies for the resectibility assessment.
Results: There was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between CT and CE-EUS for the evaluation of adjacent organ invasion, lymph node metastasis and liver metastasis (P > 0.05). For the diagnosis of periampullary neoplasm and assessment of vascular invasion, CE-EUS was better than CT (94.6% vs 84.1%, P = 0.023; 96.2% vs 85.9%, P = 0.041). Logistic regression indicated that the accuracy of CE-EUS in determing adjacent organ invasion was correlated with the tumor size, and vascular invasion was correlated with the tumor location and size.
Conclusions: CE-EUS has advantages in the assessment of the resectibility of periampullary neoplasm, especially for the assessment of vascular invasion, and can be used as a supplementary Image technology to the enhanced CT.