Reply to "Polarization modulation adds little additional information to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy"
Nat Methods
.
2016 Jan;13(1):8-9.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3721.
Authors
Nour Hafi
1
,
Matthias Grunwald
2
,
Laura S van den Heuvel
1
,
Timo Aspelmeier
3
4
5
,
Claudia Steinem
6
,
Martin Korte
7
,
Axel Munk
3
4
5
,
Peter J Walla
1
2
Affiliations
1
Department of Biophysical Chemistry, Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
2
Biomolecular Spectroscopy and Single-Molecule Detection Group, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
3
Felix Bernstein Institute for Mathematical Statistics in Bioscience, Göttingen, Germany.
4
Institute for Mathematical Stochastics, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
5
Statistical Inverse Problems in Biophysics Group, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
6
Institute of Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
7
Division of Cellular Neurobiology, Zoological Institute, University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
PMID:
26716557
DOI:
10.1038/nmeth.3721
No abstract available
Publication types
Letter
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Comment
MeSH terms
Animals
Fluorescence Polarization / methods*
Microscopy, Fluorescence / methods*
Nanotechnology / methods*