Aim: To compare the accuracy of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (Wb-MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron-emission tomography co-registered with low dose-CT (PET-CT) in defining lymphoma disease stage.
Materials and methods: From February 2010 to May 2014, 41 lymphoma patients underwent Wb-MRI-DWI, CE-CT, and (18)F-FDG PET-CT. Histological subtypes included aggressive B-cell (n=11), follicular (n=13), mantle cell (n=3), and Hodgkin's (n=14) lymphoma. To compare the procedures, the reference standard (RS) assessment was defined by combining the results from (18)F-FDG PET-CT, CE-CT, and bone marrow (BM) histology, modifications after therapy, and histological re-assessments of uncertain lesions.
Results: Among 1025 nodal sites, 217 had disease involvement according to the RS. CE-CT yielded 23 false-negative and 11 false-positive errors. Wb-MRI-DWI failed to recognise 17 localisations and had six false-positive errors; (18)F-FDG PET-CT had no errors. Among 458 extranodal sites, 37 were positive according to the RS. (18)F-FDG PET-CT yielded four false-negative and two false-positive results. CE-CT yielded 17 false-negative errors. Wb-MRI-DWI yielded a single false-negative error. Wb-MRI-DWI was the most reliable imaging technique for BM evaluation. Considering each procedure alone, the final stage would have been missed in four cases using (18)F-FDG PET-CT, 12 cases using CE-CT, and none using Wb-MRI-DWI.
Conclusion: The present data support Wb-MRI-DWI as a sensitive and specific imaging technique for lymphoma evaluation, supporting its use in place of CE-CT for staging.
Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.