[Outcomes of refractory or relapsed DNMT3A + cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia patients followed the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen]

Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;36(12):1025-30. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.12.010.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To study clinical characteristics of refractory or relapsed DNMT3A⁺ cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia(CN-AML)patients, and to explore the overall response rate(ORR)and side effects of these patients followed the therapy including decitabine with CAG or CAGlike regimen.

Methods: In this study we retrospectively analyzed 53 refractory or relapsed CN- AML patients receiving the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG and CAG- like regimen in our center from April 2011 to October 2014. The clinical characteristics and ORR were further analyzed. Based on gene mutations, these patients could be divided into 2 groups: DNMT3A⁺ AML patients(n=24)and DNMT3A- AML patients(n=29).

Results: The median age of DNMT3A⁺AML patients was 46 years old, higher white blood cells and bone marrow blasts were observed in DNMT3A+ AML group. The ORR and complete response(CR)rate of DNMT3A+ group were 62.50% and 54.17%, respectively. No differences were observed in ORR and CR rates(P>0.05)between these two groups. DNMT3A⁺/FLT3-ITD⁺ CN-AML patients(n=14)had higher ORR and CR rates than DNMT3A-/FLT3-ITD⁺CN- AML patients(n=15)(P= 0.040 and 0.042, respectively). The one- year overall survival (OS) of DNMT3A⁺ AML group and DNMT3A- AML group were 59.58% , 54.09% , no differences were observed (P=0.438). 25 patients received further therapy of allo-HSCT, the one-year OS of DNMT3A⁺ CN-AML was 87.50% and one-year disease free survival(DFS)was 72.73%, while the one- year OS was 61.54% and one- year DFS was 58.02% in DNMT3A⁻ group. No differences were observed between 2 groups (P=0.456, 0.217).

Conclusion: Decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen was an effective and safe treatment for refractory or relapsed CN- AML patients. Compared to DNMT3A⁻/FLT3- ITD⁺ CN- AML patients, DNMT3A⁺/ FLT3-ITD⁺ CN-AML patients had higher ORR and CR rates. Decitabine bridged hematopoietic stem cells transplant could likely improve the survival of refractory or relapsed CN-AML patients.

目的: 观察地西他滨联合预激方案再诱导治疗伴DNA甲基转移酶(DNMT3A)基因突变的复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病(CN-AML)的疗效。

方法: 回顾性分析2011年4月至2014年10月接受地西他滨联合预激方案再诱导治疗的53例复发或难治CN-AML患者的临床特征及对地西他滨联合预激方案的治疗反应,其中伴DNMT3A基因突变(DNMT3A+)24例,不伴DNMT3A基因突变(DNMT3A)29例。

结果: DNMT3A+组患者中位年龄为46(26~68)岁,与DNMT3A组差异无统计学意义,WBC中位数19.5(0.5~218.5)×109/L,骨髓原始细胞中位数0.635(0.020~0.920),较DNMT3A组高,但差异亦无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。DNMT3A+患者对地西他滨联合预激方案治疗的总体反应率(ORR)达62.50%,完全缓解(CR)率为54.17%,DNMT3A组分别为48.28%和37.93%,两组相比差异无统计学意义(P值分别为0.407、0.277)。两组患者应用地西他滨联合预激方案再诱导治疗的不良反应类似。53例患者中,共有29例患者伴有FLT3-ITD突变,FLT3-ITD+/DNMT3A+组(14例)与FLT3-ITD+/DNMT3A组(15例)的ORR及CR率差异有统计学意义(P值分别为0.040、0.042)。DNMT3A+组与DNMT3A组1年总生存(OS)率分别为59.58%和54.09%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.438)。后期25例患者行异基因造血干细胞移植,DNMT3A+ CN-AML患者1年OS率为87.50%,1年无病生存(DFS)率为72.73%;DNMT3A组1年OS率为61.54%,1年DFS率为58.02%;两组差异无统计学意义(P值分别为0.456、0.217)。

结论: 地西他滨联合预激方案是复发难治CN-AML有效且安全的再诱导治疗手段,FLT3-ITD+/DNMT3A+组CN-AML患者对地西他滨联合预激方案的反应率优于FLT3-ITD+/DNMT3A组。地西他滨桥接allo-HSCT可以提高CN-AML患者的OS率。

MeSH terms

  • Aclarubicin / therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Azacitidine / analogs & derivatives*
  • Azacitidine / therapeutic use
  • Cytarabine / therapeutic use
  • DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases / genetics*
  • DNA Methyltransferase 3A
  • Decitabine
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute / genetics
  • Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute / therapy*
  • Mutation
  • Remission Induction*
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • DNMT3A protein, human
  • Cytarabine
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Aclarubicin
  • Decitabine
  • DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases
  • DNA Methyltransferase 3A
  • Azacitidine

Supplementary concepts

  • CAG protocol

Grants and funding

基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81302046、81270617);国家临床重点专科建设项目;卫生公益性行业科研专项(201202017);高等学校博士点新教师基金(20123201120021);江苏高校优势学科建设工程血液转化医学项目;江苏省科教兴卫工程-临床医学中心(ZX201102);江苏省科技厅生命健康专项(BL2012005)