Effects of Protection and Sediment Stress on Coral Reefs in Saint Lucia

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 4;11(2):e0146855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146855. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

The extent to which Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) benefit corals is contentious. On one hand, MPAs could enhance coral growth and survival through increases in herbivory within their borders; on the other, they are unlikely to prevent disturbances, such as terrestrial runoff, that originate outside their boundaries. We examined the effect of spatial protection and terrestrial sediment on the benthic composition of coral reefs in Saint Lucia. In 2011 (10 to 16 years after MPAs were created), we resurveyed 21 reefs that had been surveyed in 2001 and analyzed current benthic assemblages as well as changes in benthic cover over that decade in relation to protection status, terrestrial sediment influence (measured as the proportion of terrigenous material in reef-associated sediment) and depth. The cover of all benthic biotic components has changed significantly over the decade, including a decline in coral and increase in macroalgae. Protection status was not a significant predictor of either current benthic composition or changes in composition, but current cover and change in cover of several components were related to terrigenous content of sediment deposited recently. Sites with a higher proportion of terrigenous sediment had lower current coral cover, higher macroalgal cover and greater coral declines. Our results suggest that terrestrial sediment is an important factor in the recent degradation of coral reefs in Saint Lucia and that the current MPA network should be complemented by measures to reduce runoff from land.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anthozoa*
  • Caribbean Region
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Coral Reefs*
  • Geologic Sediments*

Grants and funding

This study was supported by an International Coral Reef Conservation Grant #NA09NOS4630011 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to CB and IMC and Discovery Grant #328224-2012 from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to IMC. Neither funding agency was involved in the study design, analysis or decision to publish.