A general framework for meta-analyzing dependent studies with overlapping subjects in association mapping

Hum Mol Genet. 2016 May 1;25(9):1857-66. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw049. Epub 2016 Feb 21.

Abstract

Meta-analysis strategies have become critical to augment power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). To reduce genotyping or sequencing cost, many studies today utilize shared controls, and these individuals can inadvertently overlap among multiple studies. If these overlapping individuals are not taken into account in meta-analysis, they can induce spurious associations. In this article, we propose a general framework for adjusting association statistics to account for overlapping subjects within a meta-analysis. The key idea of our method is to transform the covariance structure of the data, so it can be used in downstream analyses. As a result, the strategy is very flexible and allows a wide range of meta-analysis methods, such as the random effects model, to account for overlapping subjects. Using simulations and real datasets, we demonstrate that our method has utility in meta-analyses of GWAS, as well as in a multi-tissue mouse expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) study where our method increases the number of discovered eQTL by up to 19% compared with existing methods.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Disease / genetics*
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Genome-Wide Association Study / methods*
  • Humans
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic*
  • Mice
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / genetics*
  • Quantitative Trait Loci / genetics*