Background To assess the reliability of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) at the primary lesion in 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) for identifying patients with lung cancer who were most likely to be cured by sublobar resection (SR). Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 120 patients who underwent SR for clinical (c)-stage IA + IB lung cancer after 18FDG-PET/CT. Various factors, including tumor size, SUVmax at the primary site, and microscopic tumor invasion, were examined to identify their association with postsurgical survival. Prognoses of patients undergoing SR were compared with those of 272 patients undergoing lobectomy and lymphadenectomy during the same period. Results The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in all patients undergoing SR for c-stage IA + IB disease were 79.5% and 82.2%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a lack of microscopic pleural invasion and SUVmax ≤ 3.0 significantly correlated with better RFS and OS in patients undergoing SR. Though there were no significant differences in RFS and OS following SR and lobectomy for c-stage IA + IB or IA disease, RFS was significantly inferior in nonintentional SR (NISR) than in lobectomy in c-stage IA disease (p < 0.01). However, in NISR identified based on SUVmax ≤ 2.0, RFS was comparable to those in lobectomy (p = 0.5371). Conclusion When certain subgroups of patients are accurately identified based on preoperative SUVmax, SR can be a highly curative surgical method for lung cancer.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.