Rationale and objectives: Although a checklist has been recommended for preventing satisfaction of search (SOS) errors, a previous research study did not demonstrate that benefit. However, observers in that study had to turn away from the image display to use the checklist. The current study tested a vocalized checklist to avoid this constraint.
Materials and methods: A total of 64 chest computed radiographs, half containing various "test" abnormalities, were read twice by 20 radiologists, once with and once without the addition of a simulated pulmonary nodule. Readers used a vocalized checklist-directing search. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) detection accuracy and decision thresholds were analyzed to study the effects of adding the nodule on detecting the test abnormalities.
Results: Adding nodules induced a substantial reluctance to report the other abnormalities (P < 0.001), as had been the case in the most recent study of the SOS effect in radiography.
Conclusions: The vocalized checklist did not reduce nor eliminate the SOS effect on readiness to report further abnormalities. Although useful for organizing search and reporting, particularly among students, a vocalized checklist does not prevent SOS effects.
Keywords: Diagnostic radiology; images, interpretation; observer performance; quality assurance.
Copyright © 2016 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.