MTH1 Substrate Recognition--An Example of Specific Promiscuity

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 21;11(3):e0151154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151154. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

MTH1 (NUDT1) is an oncologic target involved in the prevention of DNA damage. We investigate the way MTH1 recognises its substrates and present substrate-bound structures of MTH1 for 8-oxo-dGTP and 8-oxo-rATP as examples of novel strong and weak binding substrate motifs. Investigation of a small set of purine-like fragments using 2D NMR resulted in identification of a fragment with weak potency. The protein-ligand X-Ray structure of this fragment provides insight into the role of water molecules in substrate selectivity. Wider fragment screening by NMR resulted in three new protein structures exhibiting alternative binding configurations to the key Asp-Asp recognition element of the protein. These inhibitor binding modes demonstrate that MTH1 employs an intricate yet promiscuous mechanism of substrate anchoring through its Asp-Asp pharmacophore. The structures suggest that water-mediated interactions convey selectivity towards oxidized substrates over their non-oxidised counterparts, in particular by stabilization of a water molecule in a hydrophobic environment through hydrogen bonding. These findings may be useful in the design of inhibitors of MTH1.

MeSH terms

  • Amino Acid Motifs
  • Aspartic Acid / metabolism
  • Binding Sites
  • Crystallography, X-Ray
  • Deoxyguanine Nucleotides / chemistry
  • Deoxyguanine Nucleotides / metabolism
  • Hydrogen Bonding
  • Kinetics
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  • Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases / chemistry
  • Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases / metabolism*
  • Protein Structure, Secondary
  • Substrate Specificity
  • Water

Substances

  • Deoxyguanine Nucleotides
  • Water
  • 8-oxodeoxyguanosine triphosphate
  • Aspartic Acid
  • Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases

Grants and funding

All authors were employees of Astrazeneca at the time of writing. AstraZeneca provided support in the form of salaries for all authors, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of the authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.