The objective of this work was to compare the amount of residual periprostatic tissue for radical prostatectomy performed by the partial NS (PNS) technique with that performed by the nerve-sparing (NS) or wide-resection (WR) techniques. Retrospective histomorphologic evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens (RPSs) from patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was performed. The posterolateral regions corresponding to the neurovascular bundle in RPSs from 48 patients who had undergone NS, PNS, or WR during LRP (n = 30) or RARP (n = 18) were examined by two pathologists unaware of the technique used. The RPSs were evaluated at the base, mid-gland, and apex. The amount of periprostatic tissue at each site was recorded. Measurements were analyzed by use of a linear mixed model. For both LRP and RARP, each gradation of nerve-preservation was associated with periprostatic tissue, except PNS and WR did not differ for LRP at the apex and base or for RARP at the apex, mid-gland, and base. For LRP, a greater amount of tissue was on the left side of the prostate than on the right at the mid-gland level (P = 0.004) whereas for RARP the opposite was found (P = 0.024). Of 18 separate analyses, 13 were significantly associated. The study is limited by its retrospective design. The amount of periprostatic tissue in the neurovascular bundle area correlates well with the nerve-preservation approach used during LRP and RARP, providing anatomic evidence supporting the PNS approach. We also describe a novel finding of laterality bias at the mid-gland level in LRP and RARP specimens.
Keywords: Erectile function; Laparoscopy; Nerve sparing; Prostatectomy; Robot-assisted surgery.