Academic Productivity of Interventional Pulmonology Training Programs

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):536-9. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201510-704OC.

Abstract

Rationale: The Hirsch index (h-index) has been validated as a measure of academic productivity and may be an appropriate tool to assess the scholarly activity of interventional pulmonology (IP).

Objectives: This study aimed to elucidate the factors associated with increasing h-index scores among IP training programs.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted of IP training programs across the United States and Canada. Data, including their respective h-index, number of publications, academic rank, geographic location, and possession of an advanced degree, were collected on IP faculty and fellows from 23 teaching institutions.

Measurements and main results: Ninety-three IP physicians (48 faculty, 45 fellows) in all were included in the study from 23 institutions with a total of 101 data points. The faculty h-index mean was 3.88. The proportion of faculty with an h-index greater than the mean value was increased significantly with higher academic rank (P < 0.0001). In addition, physicians holding an advanced degree beyond an M.D./D.O. had a significantly higher h-index than did those without (P = 0.0062).

Conclusions: For academic interventional pulmonologists, the h-index rises with increasing academic rank and possession of an advanced degree. The h-index for IP is roughly comparable to that for other surgical and procedural-based specialties.

Keywords: academic training; h-index; interventional pulmonology.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers / organization & administration*
  • Canada
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Educational Measurement / standards*
  • Efficiency
  • Humans
  • Physicians*
  • Pulmonary Medicine / education*
  • United States