Aim: To assess image quality and radiation dose in patients with body weights ≤75 kg undergoing abdominal computed tomography (CT) with a tube voltage of either 120 or 100 kVp.
Materials and methods: Eighty patients weighing ≤75 kg were prospectively assigned to receive either 120 or 100 kVp abdominal CT in the portal-venous phase. Attenuation values of abdominal organs and image noise were measured, and the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. Subjective image quality was assessed by three independent radiologists. Radiation exposure was assessed by size-specific dose estimate (SSDE).
Results: The mean attenuation of the kidney increased by 20% at 100 kVp (p<0.0001), and the mean image noise was 27% higher in the 100 kVp (p=0.003). The CNR did not significantly differ between the groups (120 kVp, 6.6±2.8; 100 kVp, 7.4±3.6; p=0.26). Except for subjective image noise (p<0.001), no other subjective quality parameters (e.g., contrast, artefacts) were significantly different between the two groups (p between 0.094 and 0.761). The mean SSDE in the 100-kVp group (9.8±1.8 mGy) was reduced by 19% compared to the 120-kVp group (12.1±1.8 mGy; p<0.0001).
Conclusion: Manual reduction of tube voltage from the standard 120 to 100 kVp for portal-venous phase CT in patients with body weights ≤75 kg resulted in a 19% dose reduction while maintaining objective and subjective image quality.
Copyright © 2016 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.