The Impact of Mismatch Repair Status in Colorectal Cancer on the Decision to Treat With Adjuvant Chemotherapy: An Australian Population-Based Multicenter Study

Oncologist. 2016 May;21(5):618-25. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0530. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

Abstract

Background: Testing for mismatch repair (MMR) status in colorectal cancer (CRC) may provide useful prognostic and predictive information. We evaluated the impact of such testing on real-world practice regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resected CRC.

Patients and methods: A total of 175 patients with stage II and III mismatch repair-deficient (MMRD) CRC were identified from an Australian population-based study of incident CRCs. Their treatment decisions were compared with those for a cohort of 773 stage-matched patients with mismatch repair-proficient (MMRP) CRCs. The effect of MMR status, age, and pathologic characteristics on treatment decisions was determined using multiple regression analysis.

Results: Overall, 32% of patients in stage II and 71% of patients in stage III received adjuvant chemotherapy. Among the stage II patients, those with MMRD cancer were less likely to receive chemotherapy than were MMRP cases (15% vs. 38%; p < .0001). In this group, the treatment decision was influenced by age, tumor location, and T stage. MMR status influenced the treatment decision such that its impact diminished with increasing patient age. Among patients with stage III tumors, no difference was found in the chemotherapy rates between the MMRD and MMRP cases. In this group, age was the only significant predictor of the treatment decision.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that knowledge of the MMR status of sporadic CRC influences treatment decisions for stage II patients, in an era when clear recommendations as to how these findings should influence practice are lacking.

Implications for practice: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular marker of defective DNA mismatch repair found in 15% of sporadic colorectal cancers. Until recently, expert guidelines on the role of MSI as a valid biomarker in the selection of stage II patients for adjuvant chemotherapy were lacking. Conducted at a time when the clinical utility of routine MSI testing was unclear, this study found that clinicians were influenced by MSI status in selecting stage II patients for chemotherapy. Furthermore, the impact of MSI on treatment decisions was greatest in younger patients and declined progressively until age 80 years, when no effect was found.

摘要

背景. 对结直肠癌 (CRC) 进行错配修复 (MMR) 状态检验可能提供有用的预后和预测信息。我们评价了这种检验在真实世界临床实践中对手术切除后 CRC 患者辅助化疗的影响。

患者与方法. 我们从澳大利亚基于人群的偶发性 CRC 研究中, 共鉴别出 175 例有错配修复缺陷 (MMRD) 的 II 期和 III 期 CRC 患者。将他们的治疗决策与 773 例分期匹配的错配修复功能完善的 CRC 患者队列进行比较。使用多元回归分析确定 MMR 状态、年龄和病理特征对治疗决策的影响。

结果. 总体而言, 32%的 II 期患者和 71%的 III 期患者接受了辅助化疗。 II 期患者中, MMRD 癌症患者接受化疗的概率低于 MMRP 病例 (15% vs 38%, P<0.0001)。该患者组的治疗决策受年龄、肿瘤部位和 T 分期的影响。 MMR 状态对治疗决策的影响随着患者年龄增长而削弱。在 III 期患者中, 未发现 MMRD 和 MMRP 患者的化疗率存在差异。年龄是该患者组治疗决策的唯一显著预测因素。

结论. 本研究的结果提示, 对偶发性CRC MMR状态的了解影响了II期患者的治疗决策, 但是有关这些发现会如何对临床实践产生影响, 当前尚无明晰的建议。The Oncologist 2016;21:618–625

对临床实践的提示: 微卫星不稳定性 (MSI) 是 DNA 错配修复缺失的分子标记物, 见于 15% 的偶发性结直肠癌。直到最近, 关于 MSI 作为有效的生物标记物在经选择的 II 期患者辅助化疗中的作用, 在专家指南里仍然是缺失的。我们的研究开展于 MSI 常规检验在临床上的用途仍不明确的时代, 却发现临床医生在经选择的 II 期患者的化疗决策中受到了 MSI 状态的影响。此外, 受 MSI 对治疗决策影响程度最大的患者是较年轻的患者, 影响的程度则随着年龄增长而不断下降, 直至 80 岁时不再有任何影响。

Keywords: Adjuvant chemotherapy; Colorectal cancer; Microsatellite instability; Mismatch repair deficiency; Treatment decisions.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / genetics
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • DNA Mismatch Repair*
  • Female
  • Fluorouracil / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Leucovorin / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Microsatellite Instability
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Organoplatinum Compounds / therapeutic use
  • Regression Analysis

Substances

  • Organoplatinum Compounds
  • Leucovorin
  • Fluorouracil

Supplementary concepts

  • Folfox protocol