Background: Lumbar disc herniations at the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels have unique characteristics that result in worse surgical outcomes after traditional microdiscectomy compared with herniation at L3-L4. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) at L1-L2 and L2-L3, compared with those who underwent PELD at L3-L4.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical data from 55 patients who underwent PELD for single-level lumbar disc herniation between 2008 and 2014, at a mean follow-up of 29.9 ± 16.4 months (12-month minimum; effective rate, 89.1%). Surgical duration; length of postoperative hospital stay; hospitalization cost; recurrence rate; Macnab criteria assessment; visual analog scale (VAS) of back pain, leg pain, and numbness; Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) low back pain score; and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before and after surgery were evaluated.
Results: In the L1-L3 group, 76.9% of the patients had a positive femoral stretch test, compared with only 42.8% of those in the L3-L4 group (P < 0.05). Of the 49 patients with adequate follow-up, 17 (34.7%) exhibited excellent improvement, 23 (46.9%) had good improvement, and 6 (12.2%) had fair improvement according to the Macnab criteria. The VAS scores for back pain, leg pain, and numbness decreased significantly postoperatively in both groups, as did all other outcome measures (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: PELD is a safe and effective treatment for upper lumbar disc herniation and may compare favorably with the same procedure for lower lumbar disc herniation. In addition, the positive femoral stretch test was a relatively good diagnostic method for disc herniation at L1-L2 and L2-L3, compared with herniation at L3-L4.
Keywords: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy; Surgical outcome; Upper lumbar disc herniation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.