Sexing a sex-role-reversed species based on plumage: potential challenges in the red phalarope

PeerJ. 2016 May 2:4:e1989. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1989. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Sex-role reversal, in which males care for offspring, can occur when mate competition is stronger between females than males. Secondary sex traits and mate attracting displays in sex-role-reversed species are usually more pronounced in females than in males. The red phalarope (Phalaropus fulicarius) is a textbook example of a sex-role-reversed species. It is generally agreed that males are responsible for all incubation and parental care duties, whereas females typically desert males after having completed a clutch and may pair with new males to lay additional clutches. The breeding plumage of female red phalaropes is usually more brightly colored than male plumage, a reversed sexual dichromatism usually associated with sex-role reversal. Here, we confirm with PCR-based sexing that male red phalaropes can exhibit both the red body plumage typical of a female and the incubation behavior typical of a male. Our result, combined with previous observations of brightly colored red phalaropes incubating nests at the same arctic location (Igloolik Island, Nunavut, Canada), suggests that plumage dichromatism alone may not be sufficient to distinguish males from females in this breeding population of red phalaropes. This stresses the need for more systematic genetic sexing combined with standardized description of intersexual differences in red phalarope plumages. Determining whether such female-like plumage on males is a result of phenotypic plasticity or genetic variation could contribute to further understanding sex-role reversal strategies in the short Arctic summer.

Keywords: Charadriiformes; Phalaropus fulicarius; Secondary sexual traits; Sexual dichromatism; Shorebirds.

Grants and funding

The funding sources for this study were: The W. Garfield Weston Foundation (fellowship to MAG), Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (EnviroNorth scholarship to MAG, Discovery grants to NL and LM), Canadian Foundation for Innovation (grants to NL and LM), Polar Continental Shelf Project (in-kind support to NL), Canada Research Chair Program to NL, Government of Nunavut (in-kind support), Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Igloolik Hunters and Trappers Organization, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Université de Moncton. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.