Comparison of a pediatric-inspired treatment protocol versus standard-intensity chemotherapy for young adults with standard-risk BCR-ABL negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Apr;58(4):909-915. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1222376. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

Abstract

We investigated the utility of a pediatric-inspired protocol in adults aged 18-40 years with standard-risk BCR-ABL negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Retrospective outcomes of 25 patients treated with a pediatric protocol between 2008 and 2014 were compared with 22 similarly aged patients treated with an adult protocol between 2003 and 2008. Twenty-five (100%) and 19 (86%) patients achieved complete remission, respectively. At median follow-up of 36.8 months, 3-year event-free survival was increased in patients on the pediatric protocol at 80% versus 45% (p = .019). There was a trend toward improved overall survival at 80% versus 59% (p = .12). Treatment-related toxicity was not increased despite the increased treatment intensity. Patients with BCR and/or ABL copy number variation demonstrated comparatively poorer outcomes in both cohorts. In our experience with this cohort of patients, pediatric-based protocols are safe and effective, justifying their use in younger adults with ALL.

Keywords: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; adolescent; adult; asparaginase; chemotherapy.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Consolidation Chemotherapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Maintenance Chemotherapy
  • Male
  • Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma / diagnosis
  • Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma / drug therapy*
  • Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma / mortality
  • Remission Induction
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult