Ability of Fractional Flow Reserve to Predict Restenosis After Superficial Femoral Artery Stenting

J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Dec;23(6):896-902. doi: 10.1177/1526602816668306. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of poststenting fractional flow reserve (FFR) in terms of predicting restenosis in superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease.

Methods: This prospective, single-center, nonrandomized study enrolled 48 patients (mean age 76±9 years; 38 men) with 51 SFA lesions from July 2013 to June 2014. Mean FFR (distal mean pressure/proximal mean pressure) and systolic FFR (distal systolic pressure/proximal systolic pressure) were calculated, and the relationship between these FFR values and restenosis at 12 months was investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Poststenting FFR was significantly lower in the restenosis group (poststenting mean FFR 0.85±0.07 vs 0.93±0.05, p=0.001; poststenting systolic FFR 0.76±0.14 vs 0.87±0.08, p=0.015). The area under the ROC curve for restenosis in poststenting mean FFR was higher, but not statistically significant, than that in poststenting systolic FFR (0.84 vs 0.74, p=0.08). The best poststenting mean FFR cutoff value for predicting restenosis was 0.92 (sensitivity 0.64, specificity 0.91). The 4.5% restenosis rate at 12 months in the high (>0.92) poststenting mean FFR group was significantly lower (35.7%, p=0.008) than in the low (≤0.92) poststenting mean FFR group.

Conclusion: Poststenting mean FFR is useful for predicting restenosis in SFA disease.

Keywords: angioplasty; endovascular therapy; fractional flow reserve; nitinol stent; occlusion; restenosis; stenosis; superficial femoral artery.

Publication types

  • Clinical Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Femoral Artery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / therapy*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • ROC Curve
  • Stents*
  • Treatment Outcome