Comparison of echocardiographic parameters between pre-clinical and clinical advanced diastolic dysfunction patients

Background: The diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction requires evidence of grade 2 or 3 (advanced) diastolic dysfunction (ADD), but many patients with ADD do not have clinical HF manifestations, hence termed pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction (PDD). The prevalence and characteristics of PDD in comparison to overt HF disease (clinical-ADD) are still debated.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 373 patients with LVEF≥45% and ADD in our echo-lab database. Exclusion criteria were acute coronary syndromes, ≥moderate valvular disease, cardiomyopathies or pericardial disease. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence/absence of HF symptoms, namely PDD (n=249) and clinical-ADD (n=124). Demographic, clinical and echocardiographic parameters were compared between the groups.

Results: Age, gender and comorbidities were similar between groups, with only a higher body mass index and renal failure significantly more prevalent in the clinical-ADD patients. Neither LV mass nor the ADD severity was related to the presence of symptoms; lateral mitral E/E' and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were significantly higher in clinical-ADD patients (14±5 vs. 12±4, p<0.05 and 40±13 vs. 36±11mmHg, p<0.05, respectively) and were the only parameters to correlate with the presence of symptoms of clinical-ADD in multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio=1.07 (CI 1.02-1.1, p=0.008) and 1.03 (CI 1.01-1.05, p=0.01), respectively).

Conclusions: In patients referred for an echocardiogram at a community cardiology center, PDD was twice as common as clinical-ADD. Hemodynamic parameters reflecting elevated filling and pulmonary pressures, rather than traditional comorbidities and/or classical structural abnormalities, were the only parameters related to the presence of HF symptoms.