Background: Recently, 1.5-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was reported to provide a reliable alternative to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for the quantification of aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Few data are available using higher magnetic field strength MRI systems in this context.
Aims: To evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of the assessment of aortic valve area (AVA) using 3-Tesla CMR in routine clinical practice, and to assess concordance between TTE and CMR for the estimation of AS severity.
Methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients (60 men; mean age 74±10years) with known AS documented by TTE were included prospectively in the study.
Results: All patients underwent comprehensive TTE and CMR examination, including AVA estimation using the TTE continuity equation (0.81±0.18cm2), direct CMR planimetry (CMRp) (0.90±0.22cm2) and CMR using Hakki's formula (CMRhk), a simplified Gorlin formula (0.70±0.19cm2). Although significant agreement with TTE was found for CMRp (r=0.72) and CMRhk (r=0.66), CMRp slightly overestimated (bias=0.11±0.18cm2) and CMRhk slightly underestimated (bias=-0.11±0.17cm2) AVA compared with TTE. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibilities of CMR measurements were excellent (r=0.72 and r=0.74 for CMRp and r=0.88 and r=0.92 for peak aortic velocity, respectively).
Conclusion: 3-Tesla CMR is a feasible, radiation-free, reproducible imaging modality for the estimation of severity of AS in routine practice, knowing that CMRp tends to overestimate AVA and CMRhk to underestimate AVA compared with TTE.
Keywords: 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance; Aortic stenosis; Imagerie par résonnance magnétique à 3 Tesla; Sténose aortique.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.