Breaking bad news to patients with spinal cord injury in Turkey - physiatrists' perspective

J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Jul;40(4):423-431. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1234735. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

Abstract

Objective: To explore Turkish physiatrists' experiences and opinions about breaking bad news (BBN) to patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design: A cross sectional study.

Setting: Turkey.

Participants: Sixty-nine physiatrists completed a questionnaire about experiences and opinions regarding BBN and self-assessment of communication skills (CS).

Results: Eleven percent of specialists and 53% of residents were trained on basic CS. All participants believed that physiatrists should play a role in BBN and the majority reported that they delivered the bad news in their clinic. Sixty-seven percent believed that the primary responsibility belongs to physiatrists. Sixty-eight percent reported that the most appropriate time for BBN is during rehabilitation. Self-assessments of CS were considered satisfactory in most steps of SPIKES protocol. Twenty percent told absolute truth to patients while 80% stated that they did so sometimes or partially. Only 41% confirmed that they do not use unrealistic statements to comfort patients. Fewer than 60% stated that they performed the most appropriate and excellent behaviors for items in "empathy" section.

Conclusion: Physiatrists had different opinions about the style of BBN. Self-assessments of CS were optimistic, however physiatrists were not fully satisfied with their empathy skills.

Keywords: Communication; Paraplegia; Physician-patient relations; Prognosis; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cross-Cultural Comparison
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neurological Rehabilitation / psychology
  • Physiatrists / psychology*
  • Physician-Patient Relations*
  • Spinal Cord Injuries / psychology*
  • Spinal Cord Injuries / rehabilitation
  • Truth Disclosure*
  • Turkey