Management of controversial gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour clinical situations with somatostatin analogues: results of a Delphi questionnaire panel from the NETPraxis program

BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 7;16(1):858. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2901-1.

Abstract

Background: There are clinical situations (CS) in which the use of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is controversial due to lack of evidence. A Delphi study was conducted to develop common treatment guidelines for these CS, based on clinical practice and expert opinion of Spanish oncologists.

Methods: A scientific committee identified 5 CS with a common core (c-c) [non-functioning NET, not susceptible of surgery/locoregional therapy, Ki67 < 10 % (except for CS5: >10 %), ECOG ≤ 2], and controversy regarding use of SSAs, and prepared a Delphi questionnaire of 48 treatment statements. Statements were rated on a 1 (completely disagree) to 9 (completely agree) scale. Responses were grouped by tertiles: 1-3: Disagreement, 4-6: Neutral, 7-9: Agreement. Consensus was reached when the responses of ≥2/3 participants were located in the same tertile as the median value of all reported responses for that statement.

Results: Sixty five (81.2 %) of 80 invited oncologists with experience in the management of NETs answered a first round of the questionnaire and 57 (87.7 %) of those 65 answered a second round (mean age 43.5 years; 53.8 % women; median time of experience 9 years). Consensus was obtained in 42 (36 agreement and 6 disagreement) of the 48 statements (87.5 %). Regarding CS1 (Enteropancreatic NET, c-c, non-progressive in the last 3-6 months), overall, SSA treatment is recommended (a wait and see approach is anecdotal and reserved for fragile patients or with low tumor load or ki-67 < 2 %); CS2 (Pancreatic NET, c-c), overall, SSA monotherapy is recommended, except when high tumor load or tumor progression exists, where combination therapy would be considered; CS3 [Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NET, c-c, in treatment with anti-proliferative dose of SSA and progressing], overall, SSA maintenance is recommended at the time of progression, with or without adding molecular targeted drugs; CS4 (GEP-NET, c-c, and negative octreoscan®), SSA in monotherapy is only considered in low-risk patients (low tumor load and Ki-67 < 5 %); CS5 [GEP-NET, c-c (ki67 > 10 %), and positive octreoscan®], monotherapy with SSA is mainly considered in patients with comorbidities.

Conclusion: Several recommendations regarding use of SSAs in controversial NET CS were reached in consensus and might be considered as treatment guideline.

Keywords: Delphi study; Gastroenteropancreatic NETs; NET; Neuroendocrine tumors; SSA; Somatostatin analogue.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Disease Management
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intestinal Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Intestinal Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Male
  • Neuroendocrine Tumors / diagnosis
  • Neuroendocrine Tumors / drug therapy*
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Somatostatin / analogs & derivatives*
  • Somatostatin / therapeutic use*
  • Stomach Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Stomach Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Somatostatin

Supplementary concepts

  • Gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor