In an attempt to confirm the existence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with trisomy 22, we studied three patients in whom trisomy 22 imposed as the sole karyotype abnormality. After revision of the karyotypes, however, we were able to identify an inv(16) as the important primary abnormality in all of them. Based on this experience, we investigated whether at least some of the 17 AML cases with trisomy 22 reported so far might possibly have been misinterpreted. Interestingly, ten out of 16 evaluable cases were classified as M4, some of them with bone marrow eosinophilia. As in cases with inv(16), only few metaphases contained trisomy 22. Furthermore, in at least two out of the only four published karyotypes of cases with trisomy 22, an inv(16) is evident and in the other two cases it cannot be ruled out. We therefore believe that at least some of the trisomy 22 cases mentioned in the literature are in fact only secondary changes occurring in AML with an inv(16) and suggest that future reports of AML with trisomy 22 as a specific primary abnormality can only be accepted as such if inv(16) has been excluded with appropriate methods.