Top-down and bottom-up analysis of commercial enoxaparins

J Chromatogr A. 2017 Jan 13:1480:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.12.021. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

Abstract

A strategy for the comprehensive analysis of low molecular weight (LMW) heparins is described that relies on using an integrated top-down and bottom-up approach. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, an essential component of this approach, is rapid, robust, and amenable to automated processing and interpretation. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy provides complementary top-down information on the chirality of the uronic acid residues comprising a low molecular weight heparin. Using our integrated approach four different low molecular weight heparins prepared from porcine heparin through chemical β-eliminative cleavage were comprehensively analyzed. Lovenox™ and Clexane™, the innovator versions of enoxaparin marketed in the US and Europe, respectively, and two generic enoxaparins, from Sandoz and Teva, were analyzed. The results which were supported by analysis of variation (ANOVA), while showing remarkable similarities between different versions of the product and good lot-to-lot consistency of each product, also detects subtle differences that may result from differences in their manufacturing processes or differences in the source (or parent) porcine heparin from which each product is prepared.

Keywords: Bottom-up; HILIC-ESI-FTMS; LMW heparin; NMR; Top-down.

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Animals
  • Automation
  • Chromatography, Liquid
  • Drugs, Generic / analysis
  • Drugs, Generic / chemistry
  • Enoxaparin / analysis*
  • Enoxaparin / chemistry*
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight / analysis
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight / chemistry
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  • Mass Spectrometry
  • Swine
  • Uronic Acids / analysis
  • Uronic Acids / chemistry

Substances

  • Drugs, Generic
  • Enoxaparin
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight
  • Uronic Acids