The peatland vegetation burning debate: keep scientific critique in perspective. A response to Brown et al. and Douglas et al
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
.
2016 Nov 19;371(1708):20160434.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0434.
Epub 2016 Oct 10.
Authors
G Matt Davies
1
,
Nicholas Kettridge
2
,
Cathelijne R Stoof
3
,
Alan Gray
4
,
Rob Marrs
5
,
Davide Ascoli
6
,
Paulo M Fernandes
7
,
Katherine A Allen
5
,
Stefan H Doerr
8
,
Gareth D Clay
9
,
Julia McMorrow
9
,
Vigdis Vandvik
10
Affiliations
1
School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
[email protected]
.
2
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B31 2DX, UK.
3
Soil Geography and Landscape Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
4
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Edinburgh EH26 0QB, UK.
5
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GP, UK.
6
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2-10095, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
7
Centro de Investigação e de Tecnologias Agro-Ambientais e Biológicas, Universidade de Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
8
Department of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
9
School of Environment, Education and Development, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
10
Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Postboks 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
PMID:
28080979
PMCID:
PMC5062110
DOI:
10.1098/rstb.2016.0434
No abstract available
Publication types
Comment
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources*
Ecosystem
Environment
Fires*
United Kingdom