[How may practitioners interpret the results of clinical trials?]

Encephale. 2016 Dec;42(6S):S26-S29. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7006(17)30050-7.
[Article in French]

Abstract

To correctly interpret the results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), practitioners have to spot bias and other potential problems present in the trial. Internal as well as external validity of the trial are linked to the presence of such bias. The internal validity is ensured by a clear definition of the objectives of the trial. The number of patients to be included in the trial is calculated on the basis of the main objective of the trial and more precisely on the basis of the primary endpoint selected to assess the efficacy of treatment. This is the best way to ensure that the statistical significance of the result may have a clinical relevance. Internal validity depends also on the process of patients selection, the methods used to ensure comparability of groups and treatments, the criteria employed to assess efficacy, and the methods for the analysis of data. External validity refers to subjects that have been excluded from the trial, limitations of RCTs, as well as the coherence and clinical relevance of the trial. Internal validity has to be fueled by external validity.

Keywords: Biais; Bias; Essai contrôlé randomisé (RCT); External validity; Internal validity; Randomised clinical trial (RCT); Validité externe; Validité interne.

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical*
  • Humans
  • Internal-External Control
  • Physician's Role
  • Physicians*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Reproducibility of Results