Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of tertiary hospital guided and community-driven family self-help cardiac rehabilitation model. Methods: This study was a prospective randomized controlled study, 80 patients from Beijing Electrical Power Hospital and Beijing Jingmei Group General Hospital with acute coronary syndrome were included from June to December 2015 and divided into 2 groups. Patients in rehabilitation group (n=52) received tertiary hospital(Peiking University Peoples' Hospital) guided and community-driven family self-help cardiac rehabilitation for 3 months, and patients in control group (n=28) received routine secondary treatment for 3 months. Following parameters including 6 minutes walk distance, score of life quality (evaluated by Short Form-12), score of anxiety (evaluated by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), score of depression (evaluated by Perceived Health Questionnaire-9), self-management competency (evaluated by questionnaire) were collected at baseline and after treatment for 3 months. Results: Compared with control group, 6 minutes walk distance was longer in rehabilitation group((60.2±6.8) meters vs. (24.9±10.5)meters, P<0.01). The difference values between after and before intervention of life quality scores((0.14±3.90)scores vs.(-7.44±5.85)scores, P>0.05), anxiety scores((-0.16±2.12 ) scores vs.(0.70±1.13)scores, P>0.05) and depression scores((-1.17±2.79) scores vs.(0.60±0.36)scores, P>0.05) were similar between the 2 groups. The amplification of patients with regular exercise (50.26% vs. 0, P<0.05), limit sugary foods usually and always (53.22% vs. 3.98%, P<0.05), eat 200-400 g fruits usually and always (78.61 % vs. 0, P<0.05), eat 300-500 g vegetables usually and always (9.74% vs. 0, P<0.05), and answering very confident to questions such as let the physicians know about your diseases (40.17% vs. 5.00%, P<0.05), know how to take medicines (44.52% vs. 5.00%, P<0.05), know how much exercise was right for yourself (26.43% vs.0, P<0.05) were significantly higher in rehabilitation group than in control group. There were no cardiac rehabilitation training related cardiovascular events. Conclusion: Tertiary hospital guided and community-driven family self-help cardiac rehabilitation model is an effective and safe management model of cardiovascular disease in chronic phase, and it is necessary to further expand the study population to verify the efficacy of this model.
目的: 探讨三级医院指导下社区主导的家庭自助心脏康复模式的有效性和安全性。 方法: 2015年6至12月,采用随机对照研究方法,纳入北京电力医院社区卫生中心和北京京煤集团总医院社区卫生中心的急性冠状动脉综合征患者80例。将患者分为2组:康复组接受三级医院(北京大学人民医院)指导下社区主导的家庭自助心脏康复模式治疗3个月(52例);对照组接受常规二级预防治疗3个月(28例)。收集基线和治疗后3个月患者的6 min步行距离、生活质量评分(使用生活质量评定量表进行评估)、焦虑评分(使用广泛性焦虑障碍量表进行评估)和抑郁评分(使用患者健康问卷抑郁量表进行评估)、自我管理效能(使用问卷进行调查)等资料。 结果: 康复组干预后与基线之间的6 min步行距离增幅大于对照组[(60.2±6.8)m比(24.9±10.5)m,P<0.01]。干预后与基线之间的生活质量评分差值[(0.14±3.90)分比(-7.44±5.85)分,P>0.05]、焦虑评分差值[(-0.16±2.12 )分比(0.70±1.13)分,P>0.05]和抑郁评分差值[(-1.17±2.79)分比(0.60±0.36)分,P>0.05]两组之间差异均无统计学意义。干预后与基线比较,经常运动患者(50.26% 比0,P<0.05)、经常或总是限制含糖食物(53.22%比3.89%,P<0.05)、经常或总是每天进食200~400 g水果(78.61 %比0, P<0.05)、经常或总是每天进食300~500 g蔬菜(9.74%比0, P<0.05)比例的增幅康复组均大于对照组,让医生了解你的疾病(40.17% 比5.00%,P<0.05)、知道如何服用心脏病药物(44.52%比5.00%, P<0.05)、知道适合的运动量(26.43% 比0, P<0.05)回答非常有信心的增幅康复组均大于对照组。没有出现与心脏康复训练相关的心血管意外事件。 结论: 三级医院指导下社区医院主导的家庭自助心脏康复模式是一种有效和安全的心血管病慢性期管理模式,有必要进一步扩大试验人群验证这一模式的作用。.
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Community health services; Rehabilitation.