IUD use among parous women and risk of uterine perforation: a secondary analysis

Contraception. 2017 Jun;95(6):605-607. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine if delivery and lactation are risk factors for complete intrauterine device perforations.

Study design: We performed a reanalysis of the European Active Surveillance Study on Intra-Uterine Devices data set using complete penetration of the myometrium as the definition for perforation.

Results: Of the 61,448 women enrolled (70% levonorgestrel, 30% copper devices), we identified 58 complete perforations, 30 of which occurred in lactating women. Incidence per 1000 insertions was 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-6.4) for lactating and 0.6 (95% CI: 0.4-0.9) for nonlactating women. Time since delivery was also associated with perforation risk.

Conclusions: Lactation and delivery are independent cofactors for perforation. Results do not differ when restricting the definition of perforation.

Keywords: Active surveillance; Breastfeeding; Childbirth; IUD; Levonogestrel; Prospective cohort study.

MeSH terms

  • Breast Feeding
  • Datasets as Topic
  • Delivery, Obstetric
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intrauterine Devices / adverse effects*
  • Intrauterine Devices, Copper / adverse effects
  • Intrauterine Devices, Medicated / adverse effects
  • Lactation
  • Levonorgestrel / administration & dosage
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Uterine Perforation / epidemiology*
  • Uterine Perforation / etiology*

Substances

  • Levonorgestrel