Objective: To discuss the perioperative and follow-up results of different surgical methods for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients and analyzed the results. Methods: The clinic data of 351 acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients received surgical therapy at Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2008 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 272 male and 79 female patients, aging from 22 to 83 years with a mean age of (52±13) years. According to root size, aortic valve structure and the status of dissection involvement, these patients were devided into three major groups: 218 cases with root reconstruction using Dacron felts, 34 cases with root reconstruction concomitant with aortic valve resuspension repair and 99 cases in with Bentall procedure. Proper shape based on the status of dissection involvement of Dacron patch was cut and put between the middle and outerlayer of aorta, then inside the inner layerone band Dacron felt was sutured with the aorta and the new middle layer with Dacron patch as mentioned above. In some cases the prolapsed aortic valve was re-suspended to the aortic cusp. Clinical outcomes among the 3 procedures were compared by χ(2) test, Fisher's exact test, t test and analysis of variance. Results: Cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamp, and circulatory arrest times of all the patients were (250±78), (171±70) and (31±10) minutes, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 9.2%(33/351), while no difference among the 3 procedures (9.6%, 8.8% and 9.1%). In the average follow-up time of (26.0±23.0) months (range from 0.5 to 90.0 months), survival rates were similar among the 3 procedures (77.7%, 77.4% and 77.8%). Only one patient received redo Bentall procedure because of severe aortic regurgitation and dilated aortic root (diameter of 50 mm). Conclusions: The indication of root management of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is based on the diameter of aortic root, structure of aortic leaflets, and the dissection involvement. For most acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients, aortic root reconstruction is a feasible and safe method.
目的: 探讨急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层累及主动脉根部时不同处理方式的临床效果。 方法: 回顾性分析2008年1月至2015年12月在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院心胸外科接受主动脉根部处理的351例急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者的临床资料。男性272例,女性79例;年龄22~83岁,平均年龄(52±13)岁。根据主动脉根部直径、瓣叶结构及夹层受累情况选择手术方式,接受主动脉根部重建术218例,主动脉根部重建+主动脉瓣悬吊成形术34例,Bentall手术99例。主动脉根部重建方法为根据主动脉根部夹层剥离的形态剪裁涤纶片并置于主动脉中层和外膜之间,然后在主动脉内膜面垫衬带状涤纶片,将内膜面带状涤纶片、主动脉中层、夹层中的涤纶片和外膜用5-0聚丙烯缝线连续缝合形成新的近端主动脉,再将撕脱的主动脉瓣交界重新固定于主动脉窦壁。采用χ(2)检验、Fisher确切概率法、t检验和方差分析对不同手术方式的效果进行比较。 结果: 全组患者的心肺转流时间、主动脉阻断时间和低温停循环时间分别为(250±78)、(171±70)和(31±10)min,3种术式间差异无统计学意义。全组患者术后30 d病死率为9.4%(33/351),主要死因为多器官功能衰竭,3种术式差异无统计学意义(9.6%、8.8%、9.1%)。随访0.5~90.0个月,平均随访时间为(26.0±23.0)个月,3种术式的生存率差异无统计学意义(77.7%、77.4%、77.8%)。随访期间1例患者在首次术后1年因重度主动脉瓣关闭不全、主动脉窦部直径50 mm接受二次Bentall手术,其余患者未再接受主动脉根部相关手术。 结论: 急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层累及主动脉根部的处理方式主要根据主动脉根部直径、瓣叶结构及夹层受累情况来决定。对于大部分患者,主动脉根部重建安全、有效。.
Keywords: Aneurysm, dissecting; Aorta, thoracic; Aortic valve insufficiency.