Depression-related difficulties disengaging from negative faces are associated with sustained attention to negative feedback during social evaluation and predict stress recovery

PLoS One. 2017 Mar 31;12(3):e0175040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175040. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The present study aimed to clarify: 1) the presence of depression-related attention bias related to a social stressor, 2) its association with depression-related attention biases as measured under standard conditions, and 3) their association with impaired stress recovery in depression. A sample of 39 participants reporting a broad range of depression levels completed a standard eye-tracking paradigm in which they had to engage/disengage their gaze with/from emotional faces. Participants then underwent a stress induction (i.e., giving a speech), in which their eye movements to false emotional feedback were measured, and stress reactivity and recovery were assessed. Depression level was associated with longer times to engage/disengage attention with/from negative faces under standard conditions and with sustained attention to negative feedback during the speech. These depression-related biases were associated and mediated the association between depression level and self-reported stress recovery, predicting lower recovery from stress after giving the speech.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Attention / physiology*
  • Depression / physiopathology*
  • Depression / psychology*
  • Depressive Disorder / physiopathology
  • Depressive Disorder / psychology
  • Emotions / physiology
  • Eye Movements / physiology
  • Facial Expression
  • Feedback
  • Female
  • Heart Rate / physiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Reaction Time / physiology
  • Stress, Psychological / physiopathology
  • Stress, Psychological / psychology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This research was supported by a grant of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, reference 117438) awarded to AS, and a grant BOF16/GOA/017 for a Concerted Research Action of Ghent University awarded to RDR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.