Abstract
Objective:
The purpose of this article is to discuss whether the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) render it a viable diagnostic alternative to breast MRI.
Conclusion:
That CEDM couples low-energy images (comparable to the diagnostic quality of standard mammography) and subtracted contrast-enhanced mammograms make it a cost-effective modality and a realistic substitute for the more costly breast MRI.
Keywords:
CEDM; CESM; breast MRI; contrast-enhanced digital mammography; contrast-enhanced spectral mammography; costs; sensitivity; specificity.
MeSH terms
-
Arizona / epidemiology
-
Breast Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
-
Breast Neoplasms / economics*
-
Breast Neoplasms / epidemiology
-
Cost Savings / economics*
-
Cost Savings / statistics & numerical data
-
Female
-
Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data*
-
Humans
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging / economics*
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging / statistics & numerical data
-
Mammography / economics*
-
Mammography / statistics & numerical data
-
Prevalence
-
Reproducibility of Results
-
Sensitivity and Specificity
-
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / economics*
-
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / statistics & numerical data