Clinical outcome associated with the use of different inhalation method with and without humidification in asthmatic mechanically ventilated patients

Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug:45:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

Abstract

Background: Inhaled-medication delivered during mechanical-ventilation is affected by type of aerosol-generator and humidity-condition. Despite many in-vitro studies related to aerosol-delivery to mechanically-ventilated patients, little has been reported on clinical effects of these variables. The aim of this study was to determine effect of humidification and type of aerosol-generator on clinical status of mechanically ventilated asthmatics.

Method: 72 (36 females) asthmatic subjects receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were enrolled and assigned randomly to 6 treatment groups of 12 (6 females) subjects each received, as possible, all inhaled medication using their assigned aerosol generator and humidity condition during delivery. Aerosol-generators were placed immediately after humidifier within inspiratory limb of mechanical ventilation circuit. First group used vibrating-mesh-nebulizer (Aerogen Solo; VMN) with humidification; Second used VMN without humidification; Third used metered-dose-inhaler with AeroChamber Vent (MDI-AV) with humidification; Forth used MDI-AV without humidification; Fifth used Oxycare jet-nebulizer (JN) with humidification; Sixth used JN without humidification. Measured parameters included clinical-parameters reflected patient response (CP) and endpoint parameters e.g. length-of-stay in the intensive-care-unit (ICU-days) and mechanical-ventilation days (MV-days).

Results: There was no significant difference between studied subjects in the 6 groups in baseline of CP. VMN resulted in trend to shorter ICU-days (∼1.42days) compared to MDI-AV (p = 0.39) and relatively but not significantly shorter ICU-days (∼0.75days) compared JN. Aerosol-delivery with or without humidification did not have any significant effect on any of parameters studied with very light insignificant tendency of delivery at humid condition to decrease MV-days and ICU-days. No significant effect was found of changing humidity during aerosol-delivery to ventilated-patient.

Conclusions: VMN to deliver aerosol in ventilated patient resulted in trend to decreased ICU-days compared to JN and MDI-AV. Aerosol-delivery with or without humidification did not have any significant effect on any of parameters studied. However, we recommend increasing the number of patients studied to corroborate this finding.

Keywords: Humidification; MDI; Non-invasive ventilation; Spacer; Urinary salbutamol; Vibrating mesh nebulisers.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Aerosols
  • Aged
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Asthma / therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Humidifiers / statistics & numerical data*
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Metered Dose Inhalers
  • Middle Aged
  • Nebulizers and Vaporizers
  • Prospective Studies
  • Respiration, Artificial / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Aerosols
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents