Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Vascular Access Referral Policies in CKD

Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Sep;70(3):368-376. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing of vascular access referral for patients with chronic kidney disease who may need hemodialysis (HD) is a pressing question in nephrology. Current referral policies have not been rigorously compared with respect to costs and benefits and do not consider patient-specific factors such as age.

Study design: Monte Carlo simulation model.

Setting & population: Patients with chronic kidney disease, referred to a multidisciplinary kidney clinic in a universal health care system.

Model, perspective, & timeframe: Cost-effectiveness analysis, payer perspective, lifetime horizon.

Intervention: The following vascular access referral policies are considered: central venous catheter (CVC) only, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG) referral upon HD initiation, AVF (or AVG) referral when HD is forecast to begin within 12 (or 3 for AVG) months, AVF (or AVG) referral when estimated glomerular filtration rate is <15 (or <10 for AVG) mL/min/1.73m2.

Outcomes: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs, in 2014 US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained).

Results: The ICER of AVF (AVG) referral within 12 (3) months of forecasted HD initiation, compared to using only a CVC, is ∼$105k/QALY ($101k/QALY) at a population level (HD costs included). Pre-HD AVF or AVG referral dominates delaying referral until HD initiation. The ICER of pre-HD referral increases with patient age. Results are most sensitive to erythropoietin costs, ongoing HD costs, and patients' utilities for HD. When ongoing HD costs are excluded from the analysis, pre-HD AVF dominates both pre-HD AVG and CVC-only policies.

Limitations: Literature-based estimates for HD, AVF, and AVG utilities are limited.

Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of vascular access referral is largely driven by the annual costs of HD, erythropoietin costs, and access-specific utilities. Further research is needed in the field of dialysis-related quality of life to inform decision making regarding vascular access referral.

Keywords: Vascular access; arteriovenous fistula (AVF); arteriovenous graft (AVG); central venous catheter (CVC); chronic kidney disease (CKD); cost-effectiveness; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); health care costs; hemodialysis; predialysis care; vascular access referral.

MeSH terms

  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical* / instrumentation
  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical* / methods
  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical* / psychology
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Humans
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic* / economics
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic* / psychology
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic* / therapy
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Referral and Consultation* / economics
  • Referral and Consultation* / organization & administration
  • Renal Dialysis* / economics
  • Renal Dialysis* / instrumentation
  • Renal Dialysis* / methods
  • United States
  • Vascular Access Devices / economics