Chromosomal microarray as primary diagnostic genomic tool for pregnancies at increased risk within a population-based combined first-trimester screening program

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):480-486. doi: 10.1002/uog.17548. Epub 2018 Mar 4.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of high-resolution chromosomal microarray (CMA) as the standard diagnostic approach for genomic imbalances in pregnancies with increased risk based on combined first-trimester screening (cFTS).

Methods: This was a retrospective study of genomic findings in a cohort of 575 consecutive pregnancies undergoing invasive testing because of a cFTS risk ≥ 1:300 on a publicly funded population-based screening program in the Central and Northern Regions of Denmark, between September 2015 and September 2016. Women with fetal nuchal translucency thickness ≥ 3.5 mm or opting for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) were excluded. Comparative genomic hybridization was performed using a 180-K oligonucleotide array on DNA extracted directly from chorionic villus/amniocentesis samples. Genomic outcomes were reported in relation to cFTS findings.

Results: Of the 575 pregnancies that underwent invasive testing, CMA detected 22 (3.8% (95% CI, 2.5-5.7%)) cases of trisomies 21, 18 and 13, 14 (2.4% (95% CI, 1.4-4.0%)) cases of other types of aneuploidy and 15 (2.6% (95% CI, 1.5-4.3%)) cases with a pathogenic or probably pathogenic copy number variant (CNV). Of the 15 CNVs, three were > 10 Mb and would probably have been detected by chromosomal analysis, but the other 12 would most probably not have been detected using conventional cytogenetic techniques; therefore, the overall detection rate of CMA (8.9% (95% CI, 6.8-11.5%)) was significantly higher than that estimated for conventional cytogenetic analysis (6.8% (95% CI, 5.0-9.1%)) (P = 0.0049). Reducing the cFTS risk threshold for invasive diagnostic testing to 1 in 100 or 1 in 50 would have led, respectively, to 60% or 100% of the pathogenic CNVs being missed.

Conclusions: CMA is a valuable diagnostic technique that can identify an increased number of genomic aberrations in pregnancies at increased risk on cFTS. Limiting diagnostic testing to pregnancies with a risk above 1 in 100 or 1 in 50, as proposed in contingent NIPT/invasive testing models, would lead to a significant proportion of pathogenic CNVs being missed at first-trimester screening. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords: array comparative genomic hybridization; chromosomal microarray; genomic imbalance; pathogenic CNV; prenatal diagnosis; risk above 1:300.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Amniocentesis / statistics & numerical data
  • Chorionic Villi Sampling / statistics & numerical data
  • DNA Copy Number Variations / genetics*
  • Down Syndrome / diagnosis*
  • Down Syndrome / epidemiology
  • Down Syndrome / genetics*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening / statistics & numerical data
  • Maternal Serum Screening Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Nuchal Translucency Measurement / statistics & numerical data
  • Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis / statistics & numerical data*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Trimester, First
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Young Adult