Background: The accurate estimation of liver volume and right/left ratio in donor candidates is critical, but there is no method using portal vein (PV) flow.
Methods: Of 125 donor candidates, right/left liver volume ratio was estimated using ultrasound (US)-PV area ratio and Doppler US-PV flow ratio, and the results were compared with CT volumetry. We analyzed these results in 76 donors who underwent hemihepatectomy. We evaluated diagnostic values of Doppler US-PV flow for <30% remnant liver volume high-risk donors, and compared liver volume by Doppler US-PV flow with actual graft weight.
Results: In 125 donor candidates, 96.8% showed <10% difference between liver volume ratio by Doppler US-PV flow ratio and CT volumetry. Compared with CT volumetry, the mean percentage difference of liver volume ratio by Doppler US-PV flow ratio was significantly smaller than that by US-PV area ratio (±0.7% vs ±6.3%, P<.001). In 76 donors who underwent hemihepatctomy, results were similar, showing smaller mean percentage difference of liver volume ratio by Doppler US-PV flow ratio than that by US-PV area ratio (±1.0% vs ±6.0%, P<.001). Sensitivity and specificity for <30% remnant liver volume donors were 76.9% and 76.8%. Blood-free liver volume by Doppler US-PV flow was linearly correlated with graft weight (R2 =0.770, P<.001), although significantly different, with 8.5% error ratio (669.3±173.2 vs 633.7±187.1, P=.001).
Conclusion: Doppler US-PV flow can effectively estimate right/left liver volume ratio in initial donor investigation. However, Doppler US-PV flow is not accurate in assessing donors with <30% remnant liver volume and in estimating actual graft weight.
Keywords: computed tomography; donor evaluation; intravascular ultrasound; living donor.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.