Objective: To compare the post-implant target volumes and dosimetric evaluation with pre-plan, the gross tumor volume(GTV) by CT image fusion-based and the manual delineation of target volume in CT guided radioactive seeds implantation. Methods: A total of 10 patients treated under CT-guidance (125)I seed implantation during March 2016 to April 2016 were analyzed in Peking University Third Hospital.All patients underwent pre-operative CT simulation, pre-operative planning, implantation seeds, CT scanning after seed implantation and dosimetric evaluation of GTV.In every patient, post-implant target volumes were delineated by both two methods, and were divided into two groups. Group 1: image fusion pre-implantation simulation and post-operative CT image, then the contours of GTV were automatically performed by brachytherapy treatment planning system; Group 2: the contouring of the GTV on post-operative CT image were performed manually by three senior radiation oncologists independently. The average of three data was sets. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 3.2.0. The paired t-test was used to compare the target volumes and D(90) parameters in two modality. Results: In Group 1, average volume of GTV in post-operation group was 12-167(73±56) cm(3). D(90) was 101-153 (142±19)Gy. In Group 2, they were 14-186(80±58)cm(3) and 96-146(122±16) Gy respectively. In both target volumes and D(90), there was no statistical difference between pre-operation and post-operation in Group 1.The D(90) was slightly lower than that of pre-plan group, but there was no statistical difference (P=0.142); in Group 2, between pre-operation and post-operation group, there was a significant statistical difference in the GTV (P=0.002). The difference of D(90) was similarly (P<0.01). Conclusion: The method of delineation of post-implant GTV through fusion pre-implantation simulation and post-operative CT scan images, the contours of GTV are automatically performed by brachytherapy treatment planning system appears to have improved more accuracy, reproducibility and convenience than manual delineation of target volume by maximum reduce the interference from artificial factor and metal artifacts. Further work and more cases are required in the future.
目的: 探讨CT引导下放射性粒子植入治疗术前靶区定义以及术后图像融合技术在术后靶区剂量学评估中的作用。 方法: 2016年3—4月CT引导下(125)I粒子植入治疗复发恶性肿瘤10例(北京大学第三医院),所有患者均行CT扫描,设计术前计划。根据计划实施穿刺及植入粒子,植入后即刻行剂量学评估。以术后靶区确定方法不同分为两组,术后1组:术后CT图像与术前图像融合,术前肿瘤靶区作为术后靶区,拾取粒子,验证靶区体积及剂量学参数;术后2组:由三位高年资医师分别在术后图像上勾画靶区、拾取粒子,验证靶区体积及剂量学参数,取三次勾画平均值。两组分别与术前相对比,统计学方法采用配对t检验。 结果: 全部患者术后1组GTV体积平均数为12~167(73±56) cm(3)、D(90)平均数为101~153 (142±19)Gy,术后2组GTV体积平均数为14~186(80±58)cm(3)、D(90)平均数为96~146(122±16) Gy。术后1组与术前靶区体积差异无统计学意义,D(90)平均数较术前略低,但差值较小,差异无统计学意义(P=0.142);术后2组靶区平均体积与术前靶区差异有统计学意义(P=0.002),D(90)平均值较术前差异存在统计学意义(P<0.01)。 结论: 图像融合后术前靶区导入技术能减少术后靶区勾画中各种人为因素影响术后剂量验证的准确性,更客观反映了术后真实的靶区体积和剂量。.
Keywords: Gross tumor volume; Image fusion; Iodine radioisotopes; Radiotherapy dosage.