Bacterial colonization patterns in daily chlorhexidine care at the exit site in peritoneal dialysis patients-A prospective, randomized controlled trial

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0184859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184859. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Bacterial colonization patterns in daily chlorhexidine care at the exit site in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients were not known. We performed a prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolling 89 PD patients. After stratification by initial Staphylococcus aureus (SA) carrier status, patients were randomly assigned to receive daily 4% chlorhexidine care (intervention group) or normal saline (control group) at the exit site. Monthly, we cultured bacteria from the exit site and nasal swabs for 1 year. The SA colonization rates at exit site at 6 and 12 months were significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group (5.0% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.023 and 8.6% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.037 for 6 and 12 months, respectively). The Methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) colonization rate at exit site at 6 months was similar (5.7% vs. 2.5%,p = 0.596) in control and intervention group, but significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group at exit site at 12months (0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.047). The gram-negative bacilli (GNB) colonization rates were similar between the intervention and control groups at 6 and 12 months. Genotyping of all MRSA isolates showed ST (sequence type) 59 was the most predominant clone. In conclusion, chlorhexidine care at the exit site in PD patients may be a good strategy for SA and MRSA decolonization.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02446158.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Chlorhexidine / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Peritoneal Dialysis*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Staphylococcus aureus / growth & development*
  • Staphylococcus aureus / isolation & purification

Substances

  • Chlorhexidine

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02446158

Grants and funding

This study was supported by a grant from the E-DA Hospital (No. EDAHP99020) and Taiwan National Science Council (No. 100-2314-B-214-005). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.